Sinclair Broadcast Group says that MVPDs have been "vastly overstating" the impact of ATSC 3.0 on their business, including from false claims about royalties from patents related to the new broadcast transmission technology to disingenuous assertions about how their systems work.
That came in reply comments on the FCC's proposal to allow broadcasters to voluntarily roll out ATSC 3.0.
Sinclair argues cable ops are using the rollout to justify a laundry list of new regulations on broadcaster carriage rights, calling it a "transparent" attempt to hijack the proceedings" and turn it into a referendum on retrans.
MVPDs have told the FCC that broadcasters should have to separate ATSC 3.0 carriage from carriage of their 1.0 signals so that they can't effectively compel 3.0 carriage.
"Most of the MVPD's asks are rehashed versions of the same overbearing rules they have failed to secure in a decade of direct challenges to the free marketplace retransmission regime Congress adopted."
While some commenters have said the ATSC 3.0 rollout could affect the timeline for repacking stations post-auction, Sinclair said flatly "it will not."
That said, it still thinks the 39-month timeline is "wholly unrealistic" but says the ATSC 3.0 rollout does not increase the time needed for repacking.
Sinclair also took aim at the suggestion that broadcasters be treated "as secondary to unlicensed white spaces devices."
Computer companies want to make sure that broadcasters don't get any extra spectrum for ATSC 3.0 from channels they want reserved for wireless broadband.
"The hard capacity limits of existing stations will be stretched during ATSC 3.0 rollout as the same stations attempt to double the number of streams they transmit with the same spectrum assignments," Sinclair told the FCC. "The Commission should make vacant channels available to broadcasters, or to groups of broadcasters, on a temporary basis to improve service to consumers during the transition."