The National Cable & Telecommunications Association and the American Cable Association joined with other ISPs to seek a stay of the FCC's Title II reclassification order in the D.C. federal appeals court.
That came after the FCC last week denied requests by NCTA, ACA and the others to stay the June 12 effective date of the new open Internet rules until the court heard the underlying legal challenges.
It is actually only a partial stay request, since they are not challenging the bright-line rules against blocking, throttling or paid prioritization.
They are asking the court to stay Title II reclassification, as well as including interconnection in that regime, and the general conduct standard under which the FCC will review any number of things that it feels could impede the free flow of info on the net and the broadband deployment that encourages.
They also told the court that if it does not grant a stay, it should move quickly to hear and rule on the underlying challenge and agreed to work together to expedite a briefing schedule.
Also seeking the stay in the joint petition were USTelecom, CTIA, AT&T, CenturyLink, and the Wireless Internet Service Providers Association.
"Today, we have joined with other parties in seeking to stay the FCC’s decision to reclassify broadband as a common carrier service," said NCTA president Michael Powell in a statement. "Such relief is necessary to avoid the serious and substantial harms that service providers and consumers alike will bear if the FCC is allowed to subject the modern Internet to this antiquated regulatory regime. In seeking this relief, we are mindful that a stay need not upset the FCC’s net neutrality rules that prohibit Internet blocking, throttling and paid prioritization. We hope that the court will move swiftly to grant effective relief, and that Congress will soon act to provide clear authority and needed direction as to the scope of appropriate open Internet protections."
“USTelecom strongly supports an open Internet,” said USTelecom president Walter McCormick. “Our member companies have invested hundreds of billions of dollars to make that Internet a reality. We are not seeking to stay the order’s bright-line rules prohibiting blocking, throttling and paid prioritization. However, as we said in our previous stay request [at the FCC] with the FCC, we are seeking to stay this ill-conceived order’s."
“CTIA is seeking a stay to preserve the light-touch regulatory regime that, until now, has been a bipartisan success story," said CTIA president Meredith Attwell Baker. "The FCC’s decision to impose monopoly-era rules on mobile broadband, which is a highly competitive, innovative and evolving market, is an overreach and unnecessary. Our request for stay is to limit the impact that the FCC’s ill-conceived decision would have on America’s global leading wireless industry so that the ecosystem can continue to work for Americans and our nation’s economy.”
To get a stay request, the parties must show that they would suffer such harm absent a stay, and that they have a likelihood of winning the case on its merits.
The Telecommunications Industry Association, which represents network equipment suppliers, voiced its support for the effort.
"TIA stands with others in calling for a stop to the FCC’s efforts to regulate the Internet like a utility. The United States has the best Internet in the world because it is a product of a free flowing system that promotes innovation," said TIA CEO Scott Belcher. "The FCC’s new Title II rules will impact investment in new broadband infrastructure, impeding the growth and innovation that has that taken us this far.”