aioTV Sues AT&T's AIO Wireless

IP video platform provider claims pre-paid wireless operator is infringing on its trademark

Updated June 12, 11:43 a.m. ET

Tech start-up aioTV filed suit on June 11 in the U.S. District Court of Colorado against ATT's subsidiary Aio Wireless for infringing on its trademark.

The suit alleges that when AT&T established the pre-paid wireless service, Aio Wireless, it "launched an aggressive advertising and marketing campaign of an `aio wireless' service that infringes and completely appropriates Plaintiff's previously established `aio' trademark."

The suit also alleges that the AT&T service causes confusion in the market that will hurt its business prospects. It asks the court for an injunction to stop Aio Wireless and unspecified monetary damages.

aioTV offers operators a white label video platform that allows them to integrate multiple sources of live, on-demand and freely available video content into a unified TV experience across connected devices.

For example, on June 6, it announced a licensing agreement with Corporación Medcom Panamá, S.A. that enables the operator to use the aioTV OTT platform to deliver their latest video service offering, PlayTV to over 3 million customers across Panama.

The suit says that aioTV has revenue of about $1.5 million and some 150,000 users.

In an email to B&C, an AT&T spokesman responded to the lawsuit by arguing that "because Aio Wireless is in a very different business than aioTV, we don't believe there is any trademark infringement."

The spokesman also pointed out that AT&T filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on June 6. That complaint asks for a for declaratory judgment ruling that no trademark infringement exists between aioTV and Aio Wireless.


FilmOn Sues Aereo

Alleges copyright violations in an escalating legal battle over the delivery of broadcast signals to Internet-connected devices