The American Cable Association has filed an opposition to broadcasters' request that the FCC reconsider its decision—in the quadrennial ownership rule review—to retain local ownership limits on broadcast stations, saying they are rehashing arguments that the FCC has already rejected. The deadline for filing was Jan. 24.
After the FCC, in a politically divided vote, decided to leave most media ownership rules intact, the National Association of Broadcasters, Nexstar and Connoisseur Media petitioned the FCC to reconsider that decision.
NAB initially challenged the decision in court, but after Donald Trump won the presidency and a Republican FCC was taking over, it decided to shift the challenge to the FCC (it could not simultaneously pursue a court challenge).
ACA suggests that shift or not, broadcasters don't have a case.
"The Commission’s decision to retain the core components of the Local Television Ownership Rule was premised on its view that the rule continues to serve an essential purpose in protecting competition among broadcast television stations in their designated market areas," ACA said.
Broadcasters argue that the competitive landscape has changed, while broadcast ownership rules have not, leaving them at a disadvantage to MVPDs and online video providers.
ACA argues that broadcasters have already made those arguments, and that the commission took those into account before making its ruling.
"To warrant reconsideration, Petitioners cannot 'rely on arguments that have been fully considered and rejected by the Commission within the same proceeding, nor can they rely on arguments that 'fail to identify any material error, omission or reason warranting reconsideration.' Because their Petitions suffer from these failings, Petitioners’ requests for reconsideration should be denied or dismissed," ACA said.
New FCC chairman Ajit Pai was no fan of retaining the local limits.
In a 17-page opus dissent, commissioner Ajit Pai said that while "the video marketplace has transformed dramatically," the FCC has done nothing but rubber stamp the radio and TV ownership rules. "The more the media marketplace changes, the more the FCC’s media regulations stay the same," calling the quadrennial an "ostrich of an order" that was not what Congress intended and is "a thumb in the eye" of the Third Circuit, which demanded the FCC take action on program diversity.
Fellow Republican Michael O'Rielly was on the same page.