OTI Petitions D.C. Court To Review FCC Net Reg Rollback

The Open Technology Institute has joined Public Knowledge to make sure the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has at least a couple of ping pong balls in a potential lottery to see where the appeal of the Restoring Internet Freedom order is heard.

That order was the FCC Republican's Dec. 14 vote to roll back Title II classification of ISPs and reverse the regs against online blocking, throttling or paid prioritization.

If, as is usual, appeals of that decisokjin are filed in multiple circuits, a lottery is held to see which court gets the case. That lottery generally doesn't happen until after the decision (the FCC rendered it Dec. 14) is published in the Federal Register. But in the ISP challenge to the 2015 Open Internet order, early filings were considered--there was some ambiguity about the trigger date--and the lottery held based on those, OTI said. So, the groups are taking no chances, even though they say the court should consider no petitions, theirs or anyone else's, until that publication date and the 10-day window following publication in which petitions are supposed to be eligible for the lottery.

So, OTI doesn't want any premature filings considered for the lottery, but if they are, they want to be among them, though they would prefer Congress simply nullify the Restoring Internet Freedom order, as Senate and House Democrats have proposed to do.

"To be clear, the lottery should not take place until the entire order is published in the Federal Register. But given the previously mentioned ambiguities and the precedent for a premature lottery, OTI filed a protective petition," the groups said. "OTI plans to file a supplemental petition for review once the order is finalized in the Federal Register."

John Eggerton

Contributing editor John Eggerton has been an editor and/or writer on media regulation, legislation and policy for over four decades, including covering the FCC, FTC, Congress, the major media trade associations, and the federal courts. In addition to Multichannel News and Broadcasting + Cable, his work has appeared in Radio World, TV Technology, TV Fax, This Week in Consumer Electronics, Variety and the Encyclopedia Britannica.