Frame-Compatible 3D Just Fine for Now

Broadcast format designed to work within existing HD infrastructure 5/31/2010 12:01:00 AM Eastern

One of the reasons stereoscopic 3D TV is becoming reality
this year is that networks and pay-TV operators plan to transmit their 3D video
in "frame-compatible" broadcast formats designed to work within the existing
infrastructure used for HD transmission.

Such frame-compatible formats use spatial compression to
reduce the horizontal or vertical resolution of the left- and right-eye images.
That is a compromise early 3D programmers can live with, as adopting "full 3D"-delivering
full resolution to each eye-would require doubling the current bandwidth used
to deliver two-dimensional HD to the home. Another issue is that frame-compatible
formats are supported by existing set-tops in the field, including MPEG-2-only
cable set-tops, while going full 3D would require many operators to roll out
new hardware.

Some programmers, including ESPN, have said their eventual
goal is to deliver full 3D to their viewers. But executives from Comcast and
DirecTV, speaking at 3DTV2010, made it clear that frame-compatible 3D is just
fine for now.

"We've got plenty of bandwidth, but I'd like to start with
what we have," said Mark Hess, Comcast senior VP of advanced business and
technology. "It is a bit of a bandwidth issue, but with MPEG-4 it's not a huge
one; as long as we use MPEG-4, we're in good shape. But my perspective is,
let's roll up our sleeves [and use] what we've got."

Steven Roberts, DirecTV senior VP of new media and business
development, agreed: "We've already taken a big step from anaglyph [3D], and
the consumer experience is great. I think we have some time before we take the
next step."



Alert to All Users of the Disqus commenting system:
Because of a recent global security issue, the Disqus website recommends that all users change their Disqus passwords. Here's a URL about the issue: