Google-Nielsen Tie Seen as No Big DealPact Only Covers Two Minutes per Hour on 94 Cable Channels on EchoStar’s Dish Network 10/28/2007 12:00:00 AM Eastern
The announcement this past week of an alliance between Web behemoth Google and TV-ratings giant Nielsen was the latest ripple in the television industry that began with the adoption of C3 (average commercial minute plus three days of digital-video-recorder playback) as the new industry standard on which ad guarantees are written.
What was missing amid the buzz about a partnership between old-school (Nielsen) and new-school (Google) was that Google’s TV-ad inventory -- two minutes of national and local advertising per hour on 94 of EchoStar Communications’ Dish Network cable channels (Lifetime Television, ESPN, etc.) -- isn’t exactly prime inventory, according to buyers. (Google also sells the ad space via blind auctions, which is standard for online advertising but not a model many TV ad buyers are likely to embrace.)
The deal gives Google access to Nielsen’s demographic data. The Google TV Ads platform gives buyers second-by-second set-top-box data 24 hours after their spot runs. (It takes Nielsen three weeks to process its C3 data.) Such granular data give buyers the tools to make ads addressable and highly targeted -- the Holy Grail for advertisers struggling to reach consumers in the fractured media market.
But some question the accuracy and usability of data culled from a fusion of Google set-top-box data and Nielsen demographic data. As it stands, the Nielsen sample is only 12,000 homes. That sample would be further pared down in a fusion of Nielsen and Dish homes. (With 12.3 million subscribers, Dish is second in market share to direct-broadcast satellite leader DirecTV, which has 16.5 million subscribers.)
But Google’s intentions are in the right place. The Internet company hopes to bring the addressability inherent in the online ad space to television advertising, where the buckshot approach has been the norm.
Measurement companies including Rentrak, which tracks video-on-demand viewing, argued that the census-based data stream of set-top boxes allows for a much more reliable picture. (Rentrak is testing a new TV-ratings system, called TV Essentials, which crunches data from 500,000 set-top boxes from multiple markets.)
And Google is certainly looking to extend its reach beyond its Dish Network inventory.
“We believe this is a platform that can bring value with just about everybody that has television inventory. We have a full-blown aggressive effort to introduce this platform to major media companies,” said Michael Steib, director of Google TV Ads, although he declined to offer details about those efforts.
And while set-top-box data are touted as the road to further granularity, what it doesn’t provide are specifics about the person consuming the media: how old they are, whether they are male or female or how much money they make -- which is why Google thinks it needs Nielsen’s demographic data. But what Nielsen gets from the partnership is invaluable: buzz and perception that the company is embracing the post-millennium ad-space model.
And Nielsen -- which has been on a spending spree of late, acquiring or forming alliances with a plethora of small media-measurement companies, including Telphia and IMMI (both of which measure out-of-home viewing) -- will now have a direct pipeline into the dominant online advertising company.
With Google’s acquisition of DoubleClick pending FTC approval, the company is poised to become the biggest ad server in the digital space. Google is trying to extend that dominance to television at a time when traditional media is in a state of upheaval.
“The reason we got into the television-advertising business is that we fundamentally believe we have built technology platforms that make advertising more accountable,” Steib said. “That’s what Google has done with advertising online: You’ve got great measurement; you always know exactly how many impressions you’re getting; you’ve got this great feedback loop. Those levels of accountability, those areas of better measurement and those tools for optimizing your campaign have been the exclusive domain of Internet advertising. We believe those tools should be brought back to traditional advertising, as well.”