Free Newsletter Subscription
        BNC All Access

Battle of the Chairmen

November 8, 2007

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin faces increasing opposition to a vote on media ownership rules from Free Press, Moveon.org, and a bunch of Democratic senators, including current presidential candidate Barack Obama and former candidate John Kerry.

The chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee has even vowed to schedule a mid-December hearing, at which they wants Martin and the other commissioners to weigh in, a move tailored to discourage the chairman from voting by mid-December on ownership rules revises.

My guess is that the chairman (of the FCC, not the committee) will try for the vote, anyway, though I may be in the minority on that point. So far, his timetable is on track, with the Seattle public ownership hearing Friday (Nov. 9),  following the Oct. 31 localism hearing in Washington, D.C.

Martin can listen politely to the Senators, as he apparently has in private in the past few days. But if he has the votes and the will, it may take the just-dropped bill by Senator Byron Dorgan, which effectively blocks a December vote,  to keep this FCC courier from his self-appointed rounds, which are to deliver some kind of regulatory relief in line with his and other FCC Republicans’ belief that the marketplace is full of competitors and broadcasters could use some help serving the public they are uniquely chartered to serve.

It’s hard to blame Martin for trying to get the rewrite done, though it might have made more sense to wrap up the separate localism proceeding separately beforehand to remove a procedural criticism that has become a cudgel for his opponents.

At a hearing on media ownership in the Senate Commerce Committee Thursday, there was the sort of Alice in Wonderland moment of a broadcaster and newspaper owner arguing passionately against removing the crossownerhip ban, while an academic steeped in ownership studies was arguing passionately for lifting it.

But at the end of the day it was clear that Democratic legislators had an "off with his head" look in their eyes, and that the Martin-led FCC and Congress could be heading for a "blink" moment.

If that does mean no vote on ownership rules this year, it probably isn’t the end of the world since those changes will be taken to court in a Philadelphia minute by activists anyway, and the process extended five years past the 2003 attempt by Chairman Michael Powell to rewrite the rules.

Still, if a majority of FCC commissioners support a particular rewriting of the rules that they think can pass muster with the courts, that is what the Congress itself  asked the FCC to do and now seems intent on preventing. 

Posted by John Eggerton on November 8, 2007 | Comments (2)

11/9/2007 8:29:12 AM EST
In response to: Battle of the Chairmen
lemmus commented:

Do you ever get tired of dutifully framing the media ownership issue as Liberal Activists versus Free Market Fathers Know Best? Whether reporting or blogging, Republican Senator Lott's name is dropped from the story. The Parents Television Council's concerns are hidden from view. And the comments and passionate panel testimony of smaller broadcasters and newspapers, at hearing after hearing, are supressed without shame -- their anticompetitive concerns, founded for starters on the fact that 99% of American communities don't have competing dailies, fall silent behind your dutiful embargo. Aping the NAB agenda -- making an issue that is truly about the Largest Consolidated Media Companies versus The Rest of America, including family-owned media, small business advertisers, and citizens of every political stripe -- does a tremendous injustice to all but the biggest players. At some point, it might feel good to take the Goebbels statue off your desk, and report on this critical issue based on facts, not agenda.


11/9/2007 7:31:26 AM EST
In response to: Battle of the Chairmen
lemmus commented:

Dear John: Do you ever get tired of dutifully framing the media ownership issue as Liberal Activists versus Free Market Fathers Know Best? Whether reporting or blogging, Republican Senator Lott's name is dropped from the story. The Parents Television Council's concerns are hidden from view. And the comments and passionate panel testimony of smaller broadcasters and newspapers, at hearing after hearing, are supressed without shame -- their anticompetitive concerns, founded for starters on the fact that 99% of American communities don't have competing dailies, fall silent behind your dutiful embargo. Aping the NAB agenda -- making an issue that is truly about the Largest Consolidated Media Companies versus The Rest of America, including family-owned media, small business advertisers, and citizens of every political stripe -- does a tremendous injustice to all but the biggest players. At some point, it might feel good to take the Goebbels statue off your desk, and report on this critical issue based on facts, not agenda.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement


Advertisement


About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2013 NewBay Media, LLC. 28 East 28th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10016 T (212) 378-0400 F (212) 378-0470
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy