Free Newsletter Subscription
        BNC All Access

Studio 60's Not So Great Debate

October 3, 2006

Last night's Studio 60 was too far out in left field when it included a game of moral one-upmanship between Danny (Bradley Whitford) and Jordan (Amanda Peet) over whose illegal activities were more destructive. When Jordan tells Danny to make fun of her DUI arrest from eight years before which had just been leaked to the public, he goads her with, "What'd, they let you out for good behavior?" She points out that hers was drinking and driving years before, and his was "coke two weeks ago."

It could be light-hearted bantering, it could be tension between a boss and an employee. Either way, it's a few passing comments. But where the topic becomes a dubious sticking point is near the end of the episode. Danny gives Jordan the number of people who die each year because they didn't wear seatbelts, while the driver or passenger in their car lives because they did. He claims that it is relevant because she doesn't know if everyone else on the Long Island Expressway the night of her arrest was wearing their seatbelt.

You know what? I'm going to throw out the allusions to the Matt and Danny characters being Aaron Sorkin's alter-ego, and simply go with this: Why are they comparing drunk driving to cocaine usage?  Do we need to have a debate here? Don't drink and drive. Don't let cocaine take over your life. We get it–Danny's no saint, but neither are the people who may be looking down on him.

But to have a moral debate over which case of substance abuse harmed, or had the potential to harm, more innocent people?  Some things shouldn't be justified.

By Guest Blogger Liz McKeon

Posted by Caroline Palmer on October 3, 2006 | Comments (1)

10/3/2006 2:34:37 PM EDT
In response to: Studio 60's Not So Great Debate
Danie commented:

Matt and Danny are absolutely Sorkin's alter ego. He admitted it. He also admitted that a couple of characters on The West Wing were alter egos, Josh (Brad Whitford) being one of them.

What's wrong with that? The first thing I learned about writing is write about what you know. Perhaps one of the reasons this guy (Sorkin) is the first time I actually get enamoured by a writer of a TV show vs. the characters or the actors, is that he does it so brilliantly.

Who cares if he's writing from experience. His experiences only make the characters more real and believable.

I liked Danny's comment to Jordan because it's so true. When she drinks and drives, she puts other people in danger. When he sniffs coke, he only puts his life in danger.

There is a distinction, and it's one Sorkin is well aware of. I love Sorkin, and I don't care where he gets his inspiration, he's raising the bar for TV writers, and that's never a bad thing.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement


Advertisement


About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2013 NewBay Media, LLC. 28 East 28th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10016 T (212) 378-0400 F (212) 378-0470
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy