Election Night Live: Watching Fox News
Earlier in the afternoon, Fox News Channel had some moments of excitement about "Black Panthers" who seemed to be menancing a student video journalist at a Philadelphia voting location. A Fox reporter confronted one of the two men (the other one with the nightstick had left by the time Fox got there) and had a testy relationship about freedom of the press, racism and who was bugging whom more. It was an interesting hour that I suppose was supposed to at least suggest–gee, maybe a little more than that–that some voters might be intimidated at the voting booth.
Maybe it’s just my reading of body language; maybe it’s ridiculously too-hot in Arizona, but Fox’s chief political correspondent Carl Cameron looked as if he knew a lot more than he was saying about how the vote is going on Fox News Channel just now. Cameron usually is effervescent; now, he seems kind of like a guy who’s watching the first quarter of a very bad football game.
I don’t really know what other channels are doing, but Fox is running exit poll stats on the bottom of its screen that really are a snapshot of America, and it ain’t a pretty picture: 81% believe economics, 12% are excited about Obama becoming elected, 30% are scared, 85% are worried about the economy, 23% believe the economy will get worse in 2009, and 76% believe the country is off track. Here’s a nice one: 47% believe racial relations will improve in the next year. That’s not a a great stat, but it’s interesting the question is even being asked.
OK, quick quiz: When was the last time a Democrat won in Virginia? Did you say 1964? Good. I wonder why I know lyrics to thousands of really bad rock records, but I think repetition helps. Since 5 o’clock, I’ve heard that stat on Fox at least a half dozen times. I’m not knocking it, or saying Fox is saying it more than any other networks, but you watch long enough, it gets easy to memorize. Has a Republican ever elected without carrying Ohio? I’m not saying, but it starts with an N.
ceomr commented:
Solid conversational writing style, P.J., but the content is thin. I get the feeling that you didn't completely understand the point of the Fox segments you paraphrased in your blog. Perhaps they had no point, but if that was the case, try a little pre-editing. It's better not to release any material than to release weak material when no one is paying or waiting for it anyway.
Maybe a more structured essay would help you organize your thoughts better? Nice use of spell check, though. Keep trying!















