Register   |  Login Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to B&C Magazine
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Fox Asks FCC to Reconsider Indecency Petition Rejection

Network, Affiliates Fighting Fine for April 7, 2003, Airing of Married by America

By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 4/22/2008 5:24:00 PM

Fox asked the Federal Communications Commission's Enforcement Bureau to rethink its decision not to consider Fox's challenge to indecency fines against 13 stations for an April 7, 2003, airing of Married by America that showed some pixilated body parts of bachelor-party revelers.

Married by America

Fox said the petition rejection was an abuse of its discretion and a ploy to avoid the substance of the petition.

The bureau rejected the petition without considering the merits because the petition violated the 25-page limit and Fox had not sought a waiver of that limit at least 10 days before filing, as FCC rules require.

In an 18-page filing Monday, Fox said the bureau's rejection on what amounted to a technicality was illogical; contrary to agency efficiency, which the page limit was meant to promote; an abuse of discretion; and an arbitrary and capricious ploy to "avoid examination of the serious constitutional and factual arguments raised in the petition."

Fox pointed out that the seven parties to the petition -- Fox and the owners of the fined affiliates -- could have filed seven separate petitions totaling 175 pages, but instead, to cut down on paperwork, filed jointly, exceeding the limit by only 12 pages.

They even asked for a waiver of the page limit, but the FCC said they needed to do so 10 days before they did.

"Fox and the affiliates had a statutory right to a decision on the merits of their reconsideration requests, and the commission has presented no legitimate rationale for refusing to review the substance of the petition,” Fox said.

The fine was initially $1.18 million against 169 stations, but the FCC wound up only fining the handful of stations where complaints had actually been filed in that market per a new policy, calling it part of its "appropriately restrained enforcement policy." The 13 were reduced to nine when four of the stations, none of them Fox-owned, paid up.

Fox refused to pay and challenged the fine.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

PRODUCT WIRE




 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs

  • Kate Bacon
    Fates & Fortunes

    May, 15 2008
    Production and Development times 2
    From the “Toot Your Horn” department (apologies to all) comes word that DAVID HORN has b...
    More
  • Kate Bacon
    Fates & Fortunes

    May, 14 2008
    IT is it, and A&E promotions
    QVC shoppers should be happy to know that SHARON FITZGERALD has their backs. Sharon has been promote...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Photos

  • Jake Tapper's Caricatures
    ABC News' Jake Tapper has a not-so-hidden talent as a caricaturist whose work has been published in several national papers. The following are from Tapper's ABC News blog, Political Punch, at blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch
  • Headshots: Caricatures of the Fifth Estate
    From B&C's 'Fifth Estater' column, a gallery of caricatures by artist Michael Caplanis
  • CNN's Democratic Debate - Kodak Theater
    CNN hosts the first head-to-head debate between Democratic Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at L.A.'s Kodak Theater, Jan. 31.
Advertisements





B&C NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Broadcasting & Cable Today
B&C HD Update
B&C Telco IP Update
B&C Local Cable Advertising Sales
B&C Hispanic Television Update
B&C International Update
B&C TechTalk
B&C NewsCentral
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites