Register   |  Login Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to B&C Magazine
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

FCC turns DTV sites on cable

After mandating DTV tuners in all TV sets by 2007, agency gets set to tackle compatibility, plug-and-play

By Bill McConnell -- Broadcasting & Cable, 8/12/2002

As promised, FCC Chairman Michael Powell last week pushed ahead on two of three components that broadcasters say are crucial to the successful transition to DTV: DTV tuners and copy protection. The final key—making sure it's easy for consumers to hook up digital sets to cable TV—is next on his agenda.

"We're working on it," he said shortly after ushering through a new rule aimed at ensuring that American homes will be equipped to receive DTV and proposing strong copy-protection measures intended to prevent widespread copying and streaming of content over the Internet.

All three initiatives are aimed at speeding the transition from analog signals used since the Depression era to digital transmission allowing broadcasters to offer high-definition pictures, multicasts of standard definition signals, high-speed Internet and other services.

Faced by a perception that the digital transition is going too slowly, Powell is under pressure from Congress to add momentum. Since April, he has been pressing, with varying success, to get broadcast and cable nets to offer more high-definition programming and to get stations to commit to carrying network digital programming.

As for incorporating digital tuners, TV-set makers have largely refused. Powell, however, is convinced that the sale of 25 million analog-only sets each year jeopardizes the digital transition.

So far, the FCC hasn't weighed in on the third critical component in the mix: technical standards necessary for "plug-and-play" sets that work with cable without the need for extra converter boxes that consumers must buy or lease. Ensuring cable/DTV compatibility is critical because 70% of Americans rely on cable for their TV (another 15% rely on satellite).

"That's what has to be done next," said FCC Media Bureau Chief Ken Ferree, who will call various industry parties to one of his frequent DTV "hoedowns" in the next couple weeks to resolve some of the lingering disputes. In addition to stalemates over plug-and-play standards, there are disagreements between the cable industry and consumer electronics makers over copy-protection capabilities, standards for two-way interactive communication, and interfaces used between cable-industry security devices and retail set-top boxes.

"There is a golden opportunity for the industries to get involved and resolve some issues and keep the commission out to the extent they can," Ferree said. "We would prefer industry-driven solutions."

Said Marc Smith, spokesman for the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, "We're optimistic the industries can resolve this and save our friends at the FCC some work."

Other FCC commissioners agree that cable disputes are a top priority. "We must quickly address cable-compatible issues," said Commissioner Michael Copps. Commissioner Kevin Martin, noting that only 15% of Americans rely on over-the-air tuners to get TV, went so far as to cast the lone vote against last week's mandate because no cable-compatibility requirement was included.

Martin's dissent echoed the complaints of the Consumer Electronics Association, which plans to fight the tuner mandate in court. CEA says the requirement could add up to $250 to the price of each television set, a figure the National Association of Broadcasters disputes as far too high. That is probably no deal-breaker for the big-screen sets costing $2,000 and up that initially must face the mandate, but could double the cost of smaller sets, says CEA. Others say that, even if CEA is right, costs will decrease rapidly as more of the new tuners enter the market.

But CEA President Gary Shapiro retorted, "If 70% of Americans are relying on cable to get their broadcast signal, then let's set a national plug-and-play standard as Congress time and time again has asked the FCC to do."

CEA members Zenith and Thompson broke with the trade group and told Powell that they could live with the mandate. As a reward, the FCC relaxed the phase-in schedule by a year to 2007.

Cable has opposed government compatibility mandates, but the FCC action does not necessarily run counter to standards pushed by the industry and its technology-development arm, CableLabs. For instance, the FCC might decide it must back cable's insistence that equipment manufacturers sign licensing agreements that would greatly limit home copying.

Meanwhile, broadcasters were cheering the FCC. "Today's decisions represent the most important action on digital television since adoption of the DTV standard in 1996," said NAB President Eddie Fritts.

CEA is gearing up to fight the tuner mandate in court. Reps. Billy Tauzin and John Dingell and Sen. Fritz Hollings, the lawmakers reigning over communications policy, insist the All Channel Receiver Act that forced set makers to add UHF to television dials also gives the FCC authority to mandate a digital tuner. But CEA disagrees. When the act was created in the 1960s, broadcasters were the only avenue for delivering television, and the government had a compelling interest in making sure UHF could be received.

Consumer advocates are backing the set makers. The FCC and its supporters are "stuck in the past chasing the Holy Grail of over-the-air television," said Mark Cooper, research director for the Consumer Federation of America. Rather than help broadcasters, the FCC should let them try to survive by creating compelling programming. In the meantime, he says, the FCC could best help consumers by lowering cable prices and stopping media consolidation.

Powell says he is on firm legal ground and derides predictions of consumer burdens as "absolutely ridiculous" because prices will drop rapidly as tuners are mass-produced. The All Channel Receiver Act, note FCC officials, gives the agency authority to impose any receiver standards necessary to ensure that TV sets can receive all allocated frequencies. "It's pretty straightforward stuff," Ferree said.

The tuner timetable
Each July 1 begins a new phase of the new FCC digital receiver phase-in plan
2004 >50% of sets 36 in. and larger
2005 >100% of 36-in.+ sets,
50% of 25- to 35-in. sets
2006 >100% of 25- to 35-in. sets
2007 >100% of 13-in.+ sets, receiver-equipped VCRs and DVDs

 

$250 digital tuners? Yes, more or (a lot) less

The Consumer Electronics Association says that the FCC-mandated tuners will cost $250 each. Chairman Powell says that he is confident that the additional costs associated with tuner incorporation, no matter what the costs are today, will be "relatively marginal" in the minds of consumers. So who's right?

It could be both: "Relatively marginal" may be pushing it, and $250 could be excessive. One DTV-receiver chip manufacturer says that he has seen the $250 figure and knows that his company can offer a tuner with demodulator, CPU and all other necessary components for $125 today. And that cost will continue to drop, but it may not get to the "relatively marginal" level for a long time.

Peter Fannon, Panasonic director of government and public affairs, says it took 20 years for the UHF tuner to hit the $16 mark and that tuner is much less complex than a DTV tuner, which is basically a minicomputer.

"It's not just a microchip," he explains. "It's multiple chips and many other parts that make up a very expensive add-on that very few will use in the near term."

The cost of 8-VSB set-tops has dropped from around $1,300 to nearly $400 today, but Fannon says most of that cost is not in the box or the plug. It's in the power supply, a front-end demodulator, and a substantial amount of processing memory and decoding and formatting capability.

"The DTV tuner is not a $16 chip by 2006," he adds, "and wishing will not make it so."

The device will be a simple tuner, incapable of doing some things: For example, the tuner couldn't be used for conditional-access services such as a broadcaster's pay-per-view service that stations may someday choose to offer. Over time, as conditional-access and interactive-TV standards are ironed out, those capabilities can be added. An analog tuner will most likely still be included in sets, and smaller 4:3 sets will letterbox any widescreen content.

A potential problem is cheap tuner solutions coupled with the low-power signals that many broadcasters are electing to send out to viewers. With both manufacturers and broadcasters looking to save money, the loser could be the stereotypical Joe Sixpack.

"Unless the viewer has a pretty good antenna outside the house, they won't receive the signal anyway," says one industry executive. "You know what the set manufacturers are going to do: They're going to find the lowest-noise, highest-gain chip they can find because it's the cheapest thing to put in. It's just not going to work." Ken Kerschbaumer

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

PRODUCT WIRE




 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Photos

Advertisements





B&C NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Broadcasting & Cable Today
B&C HD Update
B&C Telco IP Update
B&C Local Cable Advertising Sales
B&C Hispanic Television Update
B&C International Update
B&C TechTalk
B&C NewsCentral
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites