Register   |  Login Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to B&C Magazine
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

The demands of demand

At CTAM, the talk is VOD and getting it to work for MSOs and networks

By John M. Higgins -- Broadcasting & Cable, 7/22/2002

The purpose of marketing is to spark demand. But it is demand—video-on-demand—that has cable marketing executives anxious.

VOD and its TV-on-demand cousin, the personal video recorder (PVR), dominated last week's CTAM Summit, the annual gathering of cable-system and -network marketing managers.

Time Warner Cable Vice Chairman John Billock cautioned that missteps in the demand-video arena could further disappoint video-hungry consumers. Cable is already losing 2 million customers annually to direct-broadcast-satellite providers, which generally offer a superior channel lineup. Cable operators, he said, "have to claim our technological superiority."

The two products hold both promise and threat to both operators and networks, which have very different issues. In VOD—serving up packages of products via a high-end cable system—operators agonize over marketing and packaging movies and TV shows so that subscribers will actually demand them.

But networks are terrified that selling their programs on VOD systems will drain viewers away from the commercials. (Both networks and movie studios are also terrified over piracy.)

PVR systems like TiVo and ReplayTV present related issues. Cable operators want to integrate the video hard drives into cable set-tops. DBS, the rival to cable operators, aggressively went this route more than a year ago.

But, since piracy issues and standardization issues leave cable customers leasing equipment, rather than buying gear outright, operators can't figure out how to profitably set monthly pricing and marketing for a TiVo-like cable box and program guide.

Through all the hesitation, anxiety and uncertainty, marketing executives got the message that demand technology is coming whether it's a tight fit with their businesses or not.

Ken Potashner, CEO of ReplayTV PVR manufacturer SONICblue, said his company has been sued by 29 different media companies over commercial-skipping features and Replay's ability to send recorded TV shows and movies through an Ethernet port and onto the Internet.

The technology is inevitable, he said. "Whenever you get a disruption like you have now, with technology itself, you have opportunities on every side of the disruption. The losers are the ones that try to cement their existing business models and business approaches. The winners are the ones that take out a clean sheet of paper and redesign it."

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

PRODUCT WIRE




 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Photos

Advertisements





B&C Newsletters

Click on a title below to learn more.

Broadcasting & Cable Today
B&C HD Update
B&C Cable Technology
B&C Local Cable Advertising Sales
B&C Hispanic Television Update
B&C TechTalk
B&C NewsCentral
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites