Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Broadcasting & Cable
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email

Analyst Discounts Satellite-TV Merger Buzz

With duopoly in satellite radio about to get regulatory approval, Wall Street ponders satellite-TV duopoly of Dish Network, DirecTV.

By Robert Marich -- Broadcasting & Cable, 7/24/2008 11:21:00 AM EDT

Now that the duopoly in satellite radio is about to get regulatory approval for a merger, Wall Street is pondering whether the satellite-TV duopoly of Dish Network and DirecTV might someday combine, too.

Sanford C. Bernstein senior analyst Craig Moffett thinks the XM Satellite Radio-Sirius Satellite Radio merger -- which is expected to get approval with significant conditions attached -- is not a precedent for satellite TV, despite a buzz on Wall Street to the contrary.

“We believe it would be a mistake to assume that the XMSR/SIRI merger makes a DTV/DISH merger any more feasible in Washington,” Moffett wrote in a note to investors, naming the companies by their stock-ticker symbols. “The regulatory issues … are entirely different.”

Moffett said the criteria used in considering XM-Sirius was a broad definition of the audio-services market, which not only embraced terrestrial radio, but also portable music devices such as iPods. In such a big pie, satellite radio is a relatively small piece and, thus, regulators deem the merger as not anticompetitive.

In 2002, both the Department of Justice and Federal Communications Commission opposed a proposed DirecTV-Dish merger based on the conclusion that satellite TV is a monopoly in rural America, where fixed-wire cable service is not widely available. That narrow definition of the marketplace made DirecTV and Dish big fish in a small fishbowl.

“Nothing in six years has changed,” Moffett wrote. “The telcos’ video offerings [Verizon Communications’ FiOS TV and AT&T’s U-verse TV] have arguably added to competition in metro areas, but the telcos have not built video facilities in rural America, nor do they plan to. In rural America, a merger would still be two-to-one. Two-to-one mergers are unlawful under U.S. antitrust law.”

Moffett added that XM’s and Sirius’ concessions to cap satellite-radio prices are common in merger applications, and satellite TV making price concessions would not be sufficient to gain approvals.

RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email
Talkback
Related Content
Reed Business Information Resource Center

Featured Company


Most Recent Resources

Advertisement
Sponsored Links
marketing module, MultiCultural-Disney
Advertisement
BC Subscribe
B&C NEWSLETTER
B&C Today
HD Update
Cable Technology
VOD Newsletter
Hispanic TV Update
TechTalk
HD Programming
Multicultural Newsletter
B&C NewsCentral



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Submissions   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites