Verizon: Let Us Count the Ways FCC Is Wrong on Open Internet
Files latest brief in challenge to net neutrality rules
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 12/21/2012 3:03:23 PM
That came in Verizon's reply brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Verizon, responding to the FCC's brief defending the decision, said: (1) The FCC's reasoning that the order "escapes" a statutory ban on common carrier regs is wrong and flatly conflicts with existing doctrine; (2) the commission relies on "far too slender a thread" to support its claim of Internet regulatory authority; (3) contrary to the FCC's assertion, broadband providers are speakers, whose speech the FCC has curtailed without justification; and (4) the order is arbitrary and capricious because there is no record of abuse.
Verizon also echoes an issue being raised in a separate case, the Supreme Court challenge to the FCC's authority to preempt state and local tower citing regs. "As an initial matter, the FCC should not receive deference when opining on the existence and scope of its statutory authority," Verizon said in the brief.
That Supreme Court case could decide whether an appeals court should give so-called Chevron deference (deference to an agencies special subject-matter expertise) to an agency's decision about the limits of its own authority. Verizon thinks it shouldn't, and argued that in a brief in the High Court this week.
The reply filing was actually a joint one with MetroPCS, which is also challenging the rules. Date for oral argument in the case has not yet been set.
No related content found.
No Top Articles
Digital Rapids provides market-leading software and hardware solutions, technology and expertise for transforming live and on-demand video to reach wider audiences on the latest viewing platforms more efficiently, more effectively and more profitably. Empowering applications from..more