FCC Approves LPFM Item
Will allow more low-power FM stations in urban markets where they had been restricted
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 11/30/2012 11:25:12 AM
Genachowski pointed out that the vote was an example of Republicans and Democrats working together to create new opportunities for programming and diversity everywhere, rural and urban. He called it "a big step to empower community voices, promote media diversity and enhance local programing." Genachowski said he knew.
To make that point, and in an unusual move for an FCC public meeting, Reps. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) and Lee Terry (R-Neb.) both members of the House Communications Subcommittee and principal backers of boosting low-power FM opportunities via the Local Community Radio Act, appeared at the meeting and spoke in glowing terms about the commission's radio diversity initiative. It was an unusual appearance, a point made by commissioner Robert McDowell, who said of the legislators' presence. "It is a rare opportunity to be directly overseen by our overseers."
Doyle said LPFM was a tough fight in Congress and thanked the FCC for its action. "You guys did it, and you did it right," said Terry. He called it a big deal, and said it would provide a "tapestry of voices that is really going to enhance communities and culture."
Craig Aaron, president of Free Press, one of those who have criticized the FCC over what he sees as a rush to vote on TV and radio media ownership rule revisions without sufficiently vetting their impact on diversity, tweeted Friday as the FCC prepared the LPFM vote: "Hey @FCC, doesn't it feel great when you do something for the public? Glad to see #LPFM order. Can't wait to hear new voices on the air!"
Commissioner Mignon Clyburn said the LPFM diversity item would create a communications landscape "more reflective of the greatness of this nation." She said radio remains a vital tool for the needs of the nation, citing emergency information access during Hurricane Sandy. Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel said there was "still great value and art in community broadcasting." She called Terry one of the true heroes of community broadcasting, added that she should know since as a staffer for the Senate commerce Committee she worked on a similar Senate bill. Rosenworcel called the item balanced and one that would create new opportunities while protecting full-power stations.
Commissioner Ajit Pai also praised the diversity potential of the new applications, but said that he supported the item in part because it codified that second-adjacent-channel waiver requests would be contingent on a showing that there be no interference to existing stations, but said it should also have included a requirement that adjacent full-power stations be served with a copy of the waiver request so they could weigh in sooner if they had issues.
I have been a 1000 percent of LPFM since the first R&O in January 2000. I watched the Commission meeting. The person who just commented apparently believes that Commissioner Pai's recommendations were all incorporated in the lastest R&O. I am not willing to jump to that conclusion until the entire text of the R&O is released next week.
John O. Broomall
Christian Community Broadcasters
John O. Broomall, Sr. - 12/1/2012 11:10:05 AM EST
The N.A.B. has clearly made it's move by pushing Commissioner Pai to add additional requirements and restrictions on 2nd adjacent co-channel applications, as well as softening the cap on the limit of translator applications from one to three per market by corporate/commercial broadcast FM stations. This is a deliberate move by the N.A.B. to impede and eliminate open frequencies that otherwise would be available for LPFM stations to apply for FM licensing. The engineering studies have clearly shown that there is NO RF interference caused by 2nd or 3rd adjacent co-channels if tower separation parameters are properly followed...PERIOD. High power FM stations DO NOT NEED translators, and furthermore should have their power levels reduced!!! If coporate/commercial stations are doing their job and programming correctly, they should have no fear or concerns about any "competition" from LPFM stations. This whole thing is about money, power and manipulation by radio conglomerates and money grubbing lawyers!!! Enough is enough...stop the madness and allow LPFM stations to develope and grow. The F.C.C. should never have allowed lobbying to legislate the destruction of local, small broadcasters, and their ruthless elimination by coporate radio monopolies in the first place!!!
John Denny - 11/30/2012 1:56:59 PM EST
No related content found.
No Top Articles
Digital Rapids provides market-leading software and hardware solutions, technology and expertise for transforming live and on-demand video to reach wider audiences on the latest viewing platforms more efficiently, more effectively and more profitably. Empowering applications from..more