Belo's Shive Suggests Debate Over Public Files Will Continue
Don't make us share rate information with competition
By Michael Malone -- Broadcasting & Cable, 4/26/2012 4:34:24 PM
On Belo's earnings call April 26, Shive said she did not have a problem making some political advertiser information available in digital form.
"It's not really an issue with posting files online," she said in response to a question. "The issue is really with rate information with respect to a candidate who is looking for lowest unit rate."
Having other advertisers, and rival stations, privy to that information is troubling, suggested Shive.
The FCC has been agitating for this for years. Five years ago, then FCC Chairman Kevin Martin told B&C: "Much of the debate over whether broadcasters should be subjected to additional public-interest obligations is based on whether they are serving their communities now. I think most broadcasters are doing a good job, and making public their practices will add concrete facts to this debate and should benefit them."
More recently, current FCC chairman Julius Genachowski took up the fight at the NAB show in Las Vegas. "It's the 21st century," he said. "I call it common sense."
The FCC votes on the issue April 27.
Whatever the outcome, broadcasters will continue to fight giving up too many business details to the Web. "I don't think the conversation is over with respect to being able to continue talking about if we will ultimately have to include ad rates online," said Shive. "There have been various proposals presented to the FCC with respect to be able to show total advertising spend by particular candidates or particular PACs, which we think would be meaningful information, as opposed to the rate information."
No related content found.
Most Popular Pages
No Top Articles