Conservative Group Asks Congress Not to Scrap Retrans in Reg Reform Bills
ACU says stripping away compensation would tip the scales to pay TV companies
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 3/28/2012 5:41:24 PM
ACU, whose board includes Grover Norquist and former Hewlett-Packer CEO Carly Fiorina, said that the retrans marketplace is functioning and that "stripping away" compensation for use of the broadcast signal the government would "be tipping the scales heavily to the side of the pay-TV companies."
"Despite what you might hear, under the present system there is no epidemic of service interruptions that adversely affect consumers and cause them to miss widely-viewed events like the Super Bowl," said the group. "In fact this is a marketplace in which over 99 percent of negotiations are settled with no service interruptions."
Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) last December introduced the Next Generation Television Marketplace Act in Senate. The sweeping and unlikely-to-pass legislation would throw out the retrans regime and local ownership rules. Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) introduced a House version of the bill.
That deregulatory chainsaw was aimed at clearing out "decades-old" regs they argue represent the government inappropriately picking winners and losers.
ACU is no big fan of regulation, and points out that it supports some of the bills deregulatory measures. But they suggested that the retrans marketplace was working and that the government didn't need to inject itself into that marketplace.
"Senator Jim DeMint is to be commended for trying to reduce unnecessary regulations and there are provisions in the bill we would consider supporting," they wrote. "However, one of the major outcomes of the bill would be to strip away the negotiation process known as â€˜retransmission consent.' This process created a marketplace to ensure that broadcasters were compensated by pay-tv providers for the use of their signal and content."
No related content found.
Most Popular Pages
No Top Articles