Free Press Opposes FCC Proposal to Relax Ownership Rules
Says broadcasters are skirting the rules, should be treated like duopoly
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 3/5/2012 6:04:38 PM
"[T]he FCC has no business relaxing its ownership rules when it has shown it can't even hold broadcasters to the letter of existing law," said Free Press in comments filed Monday (March 5) in the FCC's quadrennial ownership rule review. "The local TV ownership rule is supposed to promote competition between local stations, but some broadcasters are skirting the rules by entering into secret deals to combine local newsrooms and station operations," said Free Press. "If it walks like a duopoly and talks like a duopoly, it should be treated like a duopoly under the Commission's rules."
The FCC has asked whether it should count joint operating or sales agreements toward ownership rule limits, but did not propose doing so.
Media Access Project and Prometheus Radio Project gave the FCC props for not lifting the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership ban and saying that restrictions were still needed to promote viewpoint diversity. They also said that they were "heartened" that the FCC had concluded that the Internet "only confirmed the need for diversity in local news since the most frequently visited sites were affiliated with legacy media.
For a long time, I have thought that the FCC was not functioning in the best interests of the public. The FCC has not considered it’s job as a watchdog for the public but, rather, an agency to support and protect the owners and moneyed elite. The FCC is not alone in this. We need a total purge of all Bush appointees and a reorganization of agencies with all new mission statements, chief among them are the: FCC, FAA, DOJ, USDA, FDA, EPA, DOD, and DOE. That’s what I think.
Mr. Abnra Gwartney - 3/6/2012 5:34:11 PM EST
No related content found.
Most Popular Pages
No Top Articles