CEA/CTIA Pitch Low-Power Broadcast Model
Groups argue that alternative to high-power/high-tower broadcasting would free up spectrum for wireless broadband
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 12/22/2009 11:04:58 PM
The Consumer Electronics Association and CTIA-The Wireless Association say they know how to preserve over-the-air broadcasting, including HD, while freeing up spectrum for wireless broadband. But it will take a radical remake of the current broadcasting system.In a filing at the FCC on spectrum reclamation, the pair said it would require re-engineering a system that now depends on full-power stations with interference protection that leaves too many channels unused.
Instead, they say, the government could change the current high power-high tower system into a low-power network of multiple transmitters that would allow stations to operate close to each other and free up channels for other uses.
The groups argue that could free up 100-180 MHz for mobile broadband, while leaving consumer equipment intact and allowing broadcasters to continue to use all of their 19.4 mbps data stream and 6 MHz channels.
They also say broadcasters should not be asked to cover the cost of such a transition. Though they concede there would be some disruption as broadcasters went from one transmitter to a network of them, they add that would be balanced against the value of freeing spectrum for other uses.
The groups project the cost at between $1.37 billion and $1.83 billion, which they call "well within the realm of reason given the value of the spectrum." That value has been estimated as high as $60 billion.
CEA and CTIA said the proposal was an effort to make "spectrum available for important wireless broadband needs while ensuring no disruption for consumers and no injuries to over-the-air full-power broadcast television capabilities while, at the same time, potentially enabling next generation television services along with next generation wireless spectrum."
Talkback
-
OK...Why do they propose that we eliminate the "broadcast" model, which by definition is a "one way dispersal of the same program to as many people as are willing to watch it simultaneously", and replace it with numerous small "cells", all "short-casting" a common program.
Isn't the cellular-style method better suited for the "broadband" industry, where every user requires a point-to-point two-way connection?
Ken English - 12/29/2009 9:51:39 AM EST -
Ken, feel free to enlighten the rest of us with a constructive rebuttal, rather than being broadly dismissive. We'll all feel smarter for it.
bob_super - 12/27/2009 4:14:53 PM EST -
Another brilliant idea/assumption, from the people who know the least about radio-frequencies and physics.
Ken English - 12/23/2009 11:10:31 AM EST
No related content found.
Most Popular Pages
-
No Top Articles
Featured Company
-
Parks Associates
Parks Associates is an internationally recognized market research and consulting company specializing in emerging consumer technology products and services. Founded in 1986, Parks Associates creates research capital for companies ranging from Fortune 500 to small start-ups throug..more






















