Murdoch Says Mobile TV Is Key to Future
News Corp. chairman believes success tied to anytime, anywhere digital journalism
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 12/1/2009 11:13:31 AM
News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch said Tuesday that mobile DTV is key to his company's strategy for remaining successful in the age of anytime, anywhere digital journalism.
He was speaking at a Federal Trade Commission workshop on the future of journalism and whether and how the government may need to step in.
Murdoch pointed out that News Corp. was working on a project to use a portion of broadcast spectrum to deliver TV, and perhaps newspapers, to mobile devices. In fact, he said that spectrum could provide a new economic vehicle for newspapers.
Today's news consumers don't want to be chained to a box in their homes or offices to get their news and entertainment, he said.
As for the government stepping in, Murdoch said he feared, and others should too, the growing drumbeat for government assistance should be as alarming as overregulation. That includes providing taxpayer funds for journalism or giving them nonprofit status in exchange for giving up the right to endorse political candidates.
He said that would only prop up those who produce what customers don't want, subsidizing failure and penalizing success. He said that government inserting itself into commercial journalism should be "chilling" to anyone concerned about the First Amendment.
One thing he said the government could and should do is remove the ban on newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership. He said that ban made as much sense as preventing newspapers from having Web sites.
He said too many regulations are based on 20th century assumptions and business models and that if the government is really worried about the survival of the news business, it should get rid of arbitrary and contradictory regulations that prevent people from investing in the business.
Murdoch said the three things that journalism needs to prosper are 1) to deliver news people want, when and where they want it, and to "innovate like never before"; 2) convincing consumers they will have to pay for news and information online; and 3) government to clear a path for investment and innovation by reducing unnecessary obstacles to growth and investment.
The News Corp. chairman also said that his company is increasing its investment in journalism, and pointed specifically to increased news at the Fox TV stations. He said that this year, the company has added more than 50 hours of news across all its stations, brining the total to more than 700 hours of news per week, "more than any other TV station group in the country."
-
7 companies own 98% of the media and they agree and censor what is going to be and what should be publish or not. The masses are not getting the truth so go broke and disappear Murdoch. Who wants to continue being brainwashed by your infotaining. If it was honest, uncensored, live, democratic, ethical and what journalism is supposed to be about then it would be another story. We are supporting the real news and you are upset because we are NOT supporting you any longer. Let the market dictate what it wants and it is NOT you!!!
Roberto Libero - 12/21/2009 4:33:23 AM EST -
As an addendum I believe in personalized subscription plans implemented through micropayments. I certainly don't want to pay the full price for a newspaper like the New York Times, because I only read 1/20th of the articles. The rest of them are not interesting to me because of their editorial bias. So what I would like to see is a way to pay for news based on individual articles, and then to have that adjusted depending on which news sources I care about the most. All the rest is garbage.
Alex Kowalski - 12/2/2009 7:16:51 PM EST -
I only watch Fox on my television. Murdoch is correct but he's only telling half the story: there is going to have to be very restrictive DRM on news content if anything like the current journalism industry is going to survive.
The major newspaper outlets in this country all bought the techno-hype from the geeks who promised eyeballs. They're all going to go out of business or be forced to wise up.
Anyone could have told them back in 1992 that the Web was really going to destroy their business. But nobody wanted to hear that after the Dotcom boom started. All the newspapers around this country are now paying the price for not realizing that giving away your work for free is just a path to the poorhouse.
Alex Kowalski - 12/2/2009 7:06:51 PM EST -
cmenomore84 - 12/2/2009 6:14:49 PM EST
A week is 168 hours. How do you get 700 hours of news into a week?????
It is on more than one channel
bob builder - 12/2/2009 6:59:58 PM EST -
umm... is the ACLU on top of this? cuz... government controlled propaganda machines means the next step is dictatorship.
cmenomore84 - 12/2/2009 6:14:49 PM EST
Cross-Ownership Changes: Wait Till Next Year
12/06/2009Bullish Murdoch Touts News Corp. Earnings
02/02/2010News Corp. Girds For Retrans Talks
11/03/2009
VIEW ALL GALLERIES
