FCC Releases Top Five Barriers To Broadband
Affordability, insufficient digital and tech awareness levels part of problem
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 11/11/2009 1:22:57 PM
According to a request for comment issued Wednesday, the FCC has tentatively concluded that the chief barriers to broadband adoption include: "Affordability of service, affordability of hardware, insufficient digital and technical literacy levels, unawareness of the personal relevance and utility of broadband technology and online content and an inability to use existing technology and applications due to physical or mental disabilities."The FCC has given the public and industry until Dec. 2 to weigh in on how the FCC should measure and quantify broadband adoption and identify barriers to more widespread use. The FCC has 50 questions it wants answers to.
That request for comment, issued Wednesday afternoon, is part of an effort to boost the U.S.'s 63% home adoption rate--lower for some demos including minorities--which in turn is part of the broader national broadband plan due to Congress Feb. 17.
That plan requires the commission to produce a "detailed strategy" for maximum use of infrastructure and services.
The commission is asking a host of questions, including whether someone who accesses broadband at work or in a library, or has a broadband-enabled smart phone, or whether adoption should be measured more by the type or frequency of use of certain applications.
It also wants input on the costs of "digital exclusion," both to those not adopting and to society at large.
Proposed ways to overcome barriers and close that exclusionary digital divide, according to the commission, include looking at the effect of bundled service on affordability and the potential effect of a government subsidy for computer purchases.
Other possibilities include digital literacy programs and a government outreach program using multiple media.
Talkback
-
Broadband pricing in America could be characterized as a bargain, but only by the most uninformed and unworldly among us.
When you compare the cost, and the bandwidth delivered, with the recognized global market leaders in France, Japan and South Korea (as an example), the relative cost U.S. broadband in the U.S. is significantly over-priced.
IMHO, we will never catch-up to the global leaders unless we move beyond denial, and face the facts.
David H. Deans - 11/13/2009 11:39:18 AM EST -
Costs for broadband service and devices are a bargain in USA when compared to similar density other nations. Since 62% of homes buy broadband and only ~75% have PCs, it should be obvious that for two-thirds (25/38) of nonusers the constraint is either equipment cost or low utility/unawareness of broadband benefits. Providing access through library and other public PC sites will be far more cost-effective and lower risk of fraud approach to increasing usage.
Bill Blessing - 11/12/2009 4:26:42 PM EST -
The cost is the killer. We are paying way, way too much for wireless broadband. Smart phones are also too expensive. Whatever happened to that $100 laptop that Nick Negroponte and others were promoting a while back. It wasn't pretty, but it worked...
Ed Botsko - 11/12/2009 2:33:23 PM EST -
The cost is the killer. We are paying way, way too much for wireless broadband. Smart phones are also too expensive. Whatever happened to that $100 laptop that Nick Negroponte and others were promoting a while back. It wasn't pretty, but it worked...
Ed Botsko - 11/12/2009 2:33:21 PM EST -
We can't even begin to meet the vital goal of increasing computer literacy in the US until some reasonable controls are put on costs. Without this, the US has no chance of remaining competitive.
Diane H. Fabian - 11/12/2009 2:28:03 PM EST
No related content found.
Most Popular Pages
-
No Top Articles






















