Free Newsletter Subscription
        BNC All Access

Chill Out, FTC Advises on Drug Disclaimers

By Bill McConnell -- Broadcasting & Cable, 12/7/2003 7:00:00 PM

Ever see one of those prescription-drug commercials in which the announcer rapidly rips off a list of horrible side effects? Or one where you weren't sure what the pill was for? The Federal Trade Commission apparently has, too, and last week suggested relaxing rules about what prescription-drug makers can and can't say in commercials.

Consumer-targeted prescription-drug ads have been controversial since the Food and Drug Administration approved them in 1997. They are an emerging growth category for television, though, bringing in roughly $1.5 billion a year.

In comments to the FDA, the FTC argued that loosening the rules would make it "easier for consumers to understand" and would be acceptable as long as the ads contain "truthful, non-misleading information." Among FTC's suggested changes, ads would not be forced to contain a "mechanistic balance" between risks and benefits but instead would be required simply to present risks and benefits in a way that does not "convey a deceptive impression of the risk and benefits."

The FTC also said drug makers should be allowed to make "truthful, non-misleading price comparisons and other types of relative cost claims." Endorsements and testimonials should be permitted as long as they meet FTC guidelines for over-the-counter drugs and other products.

The FTC said, risk warnings contained in broadcast ads should direct consumers to a "more useful source of risk information" than the labeling the FDA required as a condition for approving the drug. For instance, information specifically designed for consumers might be more appropriate.

The commission also said available evidence debunks notions that advertising directly to consumers has increased the sale of inappropriate drugs or raised drug prices.

The FTC's comments were submitted as part of drug regulators' plan to revise guidance to advertisers on information that should be in the "brief summary" of side effects and effectiveness that must accompany all ads. The FDA will issue new guidelines next month.

Current regulations require print ads to include all the risk information contained in a product's approved labeling. The brief summary for broadcaster ads is generally shorter because of time limitations. n

Talkback
Related Content

No related content found.

Also by Bill McConnell

Most Popular Pages
    No Top Articles
Newbay Business Information Resource Center

Featured Company


Most Recent Resources

Advertisement
More Content
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Podcasts

Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

Free Streaming panel_Grossman_Graboff_Rosenblum_Tellem_Wells_vertical

Free Streaming: Killing or Saving the Television Business

Photos from the B&C/Multichannel News panel discussion and networking breakfast held Nov. 17, 2009, at the Academy Television Arts & Sciences. (Photos by credit: Craig T. Mathew/Mathew Imaging)



Advertisement
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2013 NewBay Media, LLC. 28 East 28th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10016 T (212) 378-0400 F (212) 378-0470
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy