Small Cable Ops Keep Up Leased-Access Fight
American Cable Association: Federal Communications Commission ‘Grossly Underestimated’ Time, Resources Required to Comply with New Reporting Requirements
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 5/28/2008 1:24:00 PM
A federal court stayed the Federal Communications Commission's leased-access-rule changes until it can hear a cable-industry challenge, but that hasn't stopped small cable operators from continuing to hammer away at them at the commission.
In a filing with the FCC, the American Cable Association said the changes, which include additional reporting requirements, violate the 1980 Paperwork Reduction Act.
The FCC’s Office of Management and Budget is currently reviewing the rules to make sure they don't violate that act.
The ACA, which represents smaller cable operators, said the FCC “grossly underestimated” the amount of time and resources required to comply with the new reporting requirements and pointed out that its operators, more than one-half of which have fewer that 1,000 subscribers, had the same reporting requirements as the top cable operators -- Comcast and Time Warner Cable, which have millions of subscribers.
Even if the FCC was right that it would take only 27 hours per year, per system, that was still too much for some smaller "mom-and-pop" operations, the trade group added. And that figure is not accurate, it argued.
Rather than a mere 54 hours per year, the ACA said, for its Buckeye CableSystem (just under 500 employees, 149,000 subscribers) to handle its two systems, it will have to hire an $80,000-per-year, full-time employee to deal with what it said will be a flood of leased-access requests that will result from another of the FCC's leased-access changes -- a price cut that will reduce the price of the leased channels effectively to zero.
-
When will cable systems, small or large realize the benifit of lease access programming? I bet you can't get your local High School football replays on Dish Network!!!!
Steve Jackson - 6/6/2008 8:05:00 PM EDT -
My firm has been using leased access with sites belonging to the largest MSO, Comcast, to some very, very, small one site operators.
While I admire and respect Matt Polka and often find our leased access association supporting some of his association's issues, this one is like NCTA's false premise on C-SPAN being shifted to stratospheric digital channels.
It simply doesn't need to be the case. We've had cases where a small operator simply wasted a lot of money and time having a lawyer attempt to interfere with FCC rules and delaying our use of a channel when all that the attorney succeeded in doing was...cost the operator money and delay our use. We prevailed each time.
The entire cable industry could be surprised if they quit fighting those of us with no funds or resources to fight back; accept the law and FCC rules and cooperate with LAPA to allow leased access carriage in a manner that can be mutually benficial to those of us that employ it and the cable site.
Can we suspend the attorneys for a while and get going?
Charlie Stogner - 5/29/2008 12:16:00 AM EDT
No related content found.
-
No Top Articles
Featured Company
-
Digital Rapids
Digital Rapids is the leading provider of professional hardware and software tools, technology and expertise for bringing video to wider audiences and new viewing platforms. Continuing to set new standards in quality, productivity and versatility, our solutions span the critical ..more
VIEW ALL GALLERIES
