Groups: Converter Boxes Will Become Obsolete
American Association of People with Disabilities, Consumer Federation of America, Others Write Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 5/15/2008 7:54:00 AM
The American Association of People with Disabilities, the Consumer Federation of America and several other groups asked the Federal Communications Commission to open an inquiry into what they said is a problem with digital TVs and converter boxes.
In a letter to FCC chairman Kevin Martin , they argued that manufacturers are knowingly selling products that could soon be obsolete because they do not contain automatic software-upgrade capability (think of computers and online-delivered patches and software upgrades).
They pointed out that other products, including cable and satellite set-tops and TiVo digital-video recorders, have such capability.
Reps. John Dingell (D-Mich.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) -- chairs of the House Commerce Committee and Telecommunications & Internet Subcommittee, respectively -- wanted that update function in the DTV-to-analog converter boxes the National Telecommunications and Information Administration certified for its coupon-subsidy program, but the NTIA instead chose a more stripped-down baseline model.
"The digital converter boxes now being subsidized by the NTIA and all digital televisions, with the exception of models produced by Sony, do not have any automatic software repair or upgrade capability," the groups said.
Having the upgrade function, the argued, would extend the life of all of this new equipment viewers are being required by the government to buy, would make the equipment more adaptable to upgrades in emergency or parental-control technology -- some of the set-tops are not compatible with the latest V-chip iteration, for example – and would make them better able to deal with software errors that have cropped up with some boxes.
In addition, "automatic update capability could also benefit people with disabilities," they said. "For example, it would enable rapid dissemination of new innovations and enhancements to existing technologies for captioning and video description," they wrote Martin.
The groups suggested that the FCC could address the problem by requiring such functionality as part of a certification process or labeling of the equipment, although the commission was already challenged by retailers over its attempts to require labeling of analog-only sets.
-
I understand that the digital cable issue is an inconvenience to many, but why are we spending 1.5 billion+ when we are so far into the deficit already. If the government is going to subsidize something, why don't they spend the money on fuel subsidies instead. TV is something that can be lived without, help us with something that is more of a necessity in life.
Ryan Holly - 6/11/2008 5:33:00 PM EDT -
Should Congress probe the multi-Billion-dollar converter box subsidy fiasco? Should Congress delay the death of analog until govt. and industry gets its act together -- granting more time to educate the public and ensure that the elderly and antenna-dependent are not disenfranchised from broadcast TV? Broadcast execs and public officials should be taking action now.
Adam Smith - 5/15/2008 2:15:00 PM EDT
Barton, Upton Seek DTV Answers from Martin
10/01/2007McCaskill Weighs In on DTV-Education Efforts
08/09/2007Bad Weather Would Postpone Wilmington Test
05/09/2008Sanders Concerned About DTV Transition
09/22/2008





























