Free Newsletter Subscription
        BNC All Access

Anti-Promotional Announcement

By Staff -- Broadcasting & Cable, 3/26/2006 7:00:00 PM

During a commercial break in the Winter Olympics coverage on NBC, there was a promo for the drama Medium that showed a soccer mom in one scene and her bloody corpse in the next. It's the sort of scene that would, and did, send sensitive children crying from the room during one of the last vestiges of family-appointment television.

We're not just picking on NBC. Everybody does it. But they shouldn't.

The Federal Communications Commission's latest indecency fines demonstrate that it is clearly off its regulatory rocker, abetted by a law that asks harried humans to make gut calls on what we all get to see and hear. They shouldn't be going there.

There is a difference between the FCC telling programmers they can't do something—a notion we abhor—and the media's making responsible editorial calls, which is what they are supposed to do. But we suspect programmers and networks don't grasp how annoying, disturbing or inappropriate their promos may be and how, in a matter of a half minute or so, they can offend or upset unsuspecting viewers so that their overall takeaway from television viewing is alienation and revulsion.

Television promos are little highlight reels that inevitably include verbal allusions or graphic depictions of a program's most sensational scenes. In ribald comedies or gory procedural cop shows, that often means what viewers—and their kids—see is a series' most salacious or scariest moments, dropped on them without their approval.

We wouldn't argue that networks should dull down promos. That's crazy. But the premise that promos should fit the programs they interrupt is a good start. Jarring, inappropriate promos over time don't promote at all. They repel. Stations that tell us during American Idol to stay tuned until 10:00 p.m. to find out if that deranged child murderer is on the loose in ourneighborhood ought to know they may entice thousands to watch that night but will ultimately convince even more viewers that newscasters are not precisely interested in delivering truth or serving their audience. A news tease that needlessly causes anxiety creates a viewer who, logically, should be changing the channel.

Programmers are free, and encouraged, to take into account what offends or disturbs the audience, then act accordingly. If their promos offend, those networks only accelerate American viewers' acceptance of DVRs so they can skip the promos—and, by the way, the paid commercials that are still the lifeblood of television and can be just as inappropriate.

One small child fleeing terrorized from the room during the Olympics may speak even louder than an e-mail barrage from offended religious groups over some edgy drama. At the very least, programming promos that offend viewers or scare kids don't create a very good message for the medium. Broadcasting and cable programmers, local and national, are too smart to act so stupid.

Talkback
Related Content

No related content found.

Also by Staff Staff

Most Popular Pages
    No Top Articles
Newbay Business Information Resource Center

Featured Company


Most Recent Resources

Advertisement
More Content
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Podcasts

Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

Free Streaming panel_Grossman_Graboff_Rosenblum_Tellem_Wells_vertical

Free Streaming: Killing or Saving the Television Business

Photos from the B&C/Multichannel News panel discussion and networking breakfast held Nov. 17, 2009, at the Academy Television Arts & Sciences. (Photos by credit: Craig T. Mathew/Mathew Imaging)



Advertisement
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2013 NewBay Media, LLC. 28 East 28th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10016 T (212) 378-0400 F (212) 378-0470
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy